A system of integrated planning for the implementation strategy of urban underground space development technologies

The article considers the problem of forming the construction technology for developing the underground space of cities by the example of Moscow. The article shows the urgency of developing the methodological basis for choosing and substantiating the organizational and managerial apparatus as applied to the mechanism of forming and implementing the corresponding strategy. The set of structural elements and tools of the mentioned system as applied to the strategy of underground space development as a whole and its separate components as a natural-technical geosystem have been analysed. Principles of scientific and methodical provision of underground building technologies are described. Classification and grouping of influencing factors and parameters, and also complexes of technical measures, have been given. Classes of progressive technologies of underground building have been described. The paramount importance of risk accounting at development of urban underground space is noted. The necessity of detection of tolerable level of geotechnical risk which will not result in negative consequences of application of underground building technologies is emphasized, and simultaneously it is necessary to work out the nomenclature of actions for its decrease. On the whole, it is necessary to adjust, transform and develop the system of complex strategy planning of urban underground building technologies taking into account the density of urban building, geotechnical monitoring and innovative technical solutions of geotechnical risk management within the system of management support in the underground town-planning sphere allowing in the end to quantify the existing building back reaction to the parameters of underground building technology, to increase competitiveness of underground construction.

Konyukhov D. S. A system of integrated planning for the implementation strategy of urban underground space development technologies. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2023;(2):167-178. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2023_2_0_167.

D.S. Konyukhov, Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Assistant Professor, National University of Science and Technology «MISiS», 119049, Moscow, Russia; Head of the Department of Scientific Support of Construction, JSC «Mosinzhproekt», Moscow, Russia, e-mail: gidrotehnik@inbox.ru, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0378-5558.

1. Potapova E. V. Typology of metro structures for the tasks of geotechnical risk classification. Mining Science and Technology (Russia). 2021, no. 6(1), pp. 52—60. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.17073/2500-0632-2021-1-52-60.

2. Kulikova E. Yu., Konyukhov D. S. Accident risk monitoring in underground space development. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2022, no. 1, pp. 97—103. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/ 0236_1493_2022_1_0_97.

3. Kulikova E. Yu., Balovtsev S. V. Risk control system for the construction of urban underground structures. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020, vol. 962, no. 4, article 042020. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/962/4/042020.

4. Kulikova E. Yu. Methods of forming an integral risk assessment in mine and underground construction. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2021, no. 2-1, pp. 124—133. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2021-21-0-124-133.

5. Potapova E. V. Prospects for the big data information resource in geotechnical risks control during the metro facilities construction. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2021, no. 2-1, pp. 155—163. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2021-21-0-155-163.

6. Jiangwei S. B., Xian Z. B., Yonghui C. B., Li C. Numerical parametric study of countermeasures to alleviate basement excavation effects on an existing tunnel. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology. 2018, vol. 72, pp. 145—153. DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2017.11.030.

7. Xing-Tao L., Ren-Peng C., Huai-Na W., Hong-Zhan C. Deformation behaviors of existing tunnels caused by shield tunneling undercrossing with oblique angle. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology. 2019, vol. 89, pp. 78—90. DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2019.03.021.

8. Runke H., Pengyuan Z., Zhanping S., Junbao W., Shihao L., Yuwei Z. Study on the settlement of large-span metro station’s baseplate caused by the tunnels newly built beneath it Advances. Mechanical Engineering. 2019, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1—13. DOI: 10.1177/1687814018825161.

9. Gong Zh., Li Y., Liu M., Tang C. A case study for large excavation constructed by open cutting with under mining method in Xuzhou, China. World Tunnel Congress, WTC2020 and 46th General Assembly Kuala Lumpur Convention Centre. 2020, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp. 721—724.

10. Cui J., Broere W., Lin D. Underground space utilisation for urban renewal. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2021, vol. 108, no. 3, article 103726. DOI: 10.1016/j. tust.2020.103726.

11. Guo D., Chen Y., Yang J., Heng Tan Y. Planning and application of underground logistics systems in new cities and districts in China. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2021, vol. 113, no. 3, article 103947. DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2021.103947.

12. Lebedev M. O. Validation of choice of stress–strain analysis method for support and lining in traffic tunnels. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2020, no. 1, pp. 47—60. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2020-1-0-47-60.

13. Konyukhov D. S. Analysis of mechanized tunneling parameters to determine the overcutting characteristics. Mining Science and Technology (Russia). 2022, no. 7(1), pp. 49—56. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.17073/2500-0632-2022-1-49-56.

14. Xing-Tao Lin, Ren-Peng Chen, Huai-Na Wu, Hong-Zhan Cheng Deformation behaviors of existing tunnels caused by shield tunneling undercrossing with oblique angle. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology. 2019, vol. 89, pp. 78—90. DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2019.03.021.

15. Perminov N. А., Perminov A. N. Geotechnical protection of engineering infrastructure objects in large cities under intense antropogenic impact and long term operation. Procedia Engineering. 2016, vol. 165, pp. 455—460. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.720.

16. Shao F., Wang Y. Intelligent overall planning model of underground space based on digital twin. Computers & Electrical Engineering. 2022, vol. 104, article 108393. DOI: 10.1016/j. compeleceng.2022.108393.

17. Potapova E. V. Expert-statistical approach to the analysis of geotechnical risks in the construction of metro facilities. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020, vol. 962, no. 4, article 042052. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/962/4/042052.

18. Mahdi S., Gastebled O., Khodr S. Back analysis of ground settlements induced by TBM excavation for the north extension of Paris metro, line 12. Tunnels and Underground Cities: Engineering and Innovation meet Archaeology, Architecture and Art. London, Taylor & Francis Group, 2019, pp. 2606—2615.

19. Lebedev M. O., Stepukov E. V., Larionov R. I. Stress-and-strain statement of the travolator metro tunnel lining in course of construction and operation. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2022, no. 6-2, pp. 98—114. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2022_62_0_98.

20. Lebedev M. O. Choosing a calculation method for stress-strain of supports and lining of transport tunnels. 16th World Conference of the Associated Research Centers for the Urban Underground Space (ACUUS 2018). Hong Kong, 2018, pp. 678—687.

21. Shutova M. N., Shagina A. I., Evtushenko S. I. Risk Management of construction of industrial buildings and structures. Building life-cycle management. Information Systems and Technologies. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. 2022, Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3030-96206-7_44.