In-situ uranium leaching efficiency improvement by way of in-process loss reduction

Priargun Mining and Chemical Association has been producing uranium on the Streltsovo ore field for more than 50 years. Over this period, the most of high-grade ore is extracted using the conventional physical technology. Low-grade crude ore reserves are large but the conventional technology fails to ensure wanted profitability. For this reason, wide introduction of physicochemical treatment using the methods of in-situ leaching and heap leaching can be a turning point in the further operation of this field. Heap leaching is widely applied at Priargun MCA. Commercial-scale introduction of in-situ leaching went wrong. The cause of the misfortune was inefficient blasting pre-treatment of ore before leaching; for another thing, mudding prevented speeding-up of chemical reactions in interaction of a leaching agent (sulfuric acid) and ore minerals. The research and development implemented jointly by the Transbaikal State University and Priargun MCA revealed the causes of in-situ leaching ineffectiveness in uranium production on the Streltsovo ore field. Furthermore, new ways are proposed for the wider application of in-situ leaching in uranium production from low-grade ore. This article discusses improvement of uranium recovery in solution by way of adjustment of a pH value in the medium, as well as by shrinkage of leached ore, with placement of higher grade ore at the bottom of a stope and lower grade ore at the top of the stope. The experiments prove that this approach can improve uranium recovery by 10–20%.

Keywords: low-grade uranium ore, ore and rock shrinkage, in-situ leaching, acidity, physicochemical geotechnology, pregnant solution, uranyl hydroxide, mudding.
For citation:

Zozulia A. M., Ovseychuk V. A. In-situ uranium leaching efficiency improvement by way of in-process loss reduction. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2021;(3-1):17—25. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2021_31_0_17.

Acknowledgements:
Issue number: 3
Year: 2021
Page number: 17-25
ISBN: 0236-1493
UDK: 669.21/23;57.66; 622
DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2021_31_0_17
Article receipt date: 22.10.2020
Date of review receipt: 29.12.2020
Date of the editorial board′s decision on the article′s publishing: 10.02.2021
About authors:

Zozulia A. M., graduate student Underground Mining department;
Ovseychuk V. A., Dr. Sci. (Eng.), professor of Underground Mining department, Transbaikal State University, Chita, Russia.

 

For contacts:
Bibliography:

1. Solodov I. N., Polonyankina S. V., Vorob’eva L. Yu., Noskov M. D., Ivanov A. G. Ustranenie poter’ i razubozhivaniya urana pri skvazhinnom podzemnom vyshchelachivanii х Elimination of losses and dilution of uranium during borehole subsurface leaching ъ. Razvedka i ohrana nedr. Moskva: VNIIMS im. N. M. Fedorovskogo, 2018. Vyp. no. 7. pp. 52—58. [In Russ]

2. Kochkin B. T., Solodov I. N., Ganina N. I., Rekun M. L., Tarasov N.N, Shugina G. A., Shulik L. S. Geochemical features of ore-bearing environments on uranium deposits of the Khiagda ore field. Geologiya rudnyh mestorozhdenij. 2017. Vyp. no. 5. pp. 349—362. [In Russ]

3. Sakiro G. K., Istomin A. D., Noskov M. D., Cheglokov A. A. Optimization of block mining during uranium extraction by the method of borehole underground leaching. news of higher educational institutions. Fizika. 2014. Tom 57 no. 2-2. pp. 67−70. [In Russ]

4. Shrajner A. E. Primenenie neregulyarnyh skhem raspolozheniya skvazhin pri dobyche urana metodom skvazhinnogo podzemnogo vyshchelachivaniya [Use of irregular well location schemes for uranium extraction by the method of borehole underground leaching]. Sbornik statej po materialam XXI Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma imeni akademika M. A. Usova studentov i molodyh uchyonyh, posvyashchennogo 130-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya professora M. I. Kuchina. Tomsk: NI TPU, 2017. pp. 606—607. [In Russ]

5. Castro L., Blázquez M. L., González F., Muñoz J. A., and Ballester A. Re-ductive leaching of jarosites by Aeromonas hydrophila. Minerals Engineering, vol. 95, pp. 21–28, 2016. [In Russ]

6. Golik V. I. Analiz polnoty vyshchelachivaemosti urana v kuchah. Markshejderiya i nedropol’zovanie [Analysis of the completeness of videochiamate uranium heap. mark-saderia and subsoil use]. Moscow: OOO «Geomar Nedra», 2017. Vyp. no. 3 (89). pp. 24—33. [In Russ]

7. Alikulov Sh. Sh. Mathematical modeling of filtration of underground leaching of uranium from weakly permeable ores. Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. 2017. Vyp. no. 5. S. 95 101. [In Russ]

8. Akimov A. M., Kotel’nikova S. A. Razrabotka i ispytanie issledovatel’skogo kompleksa dlya vyshchelachivaniya urana iz gornyh otvalov uranodobyvayushchih shaht [Development and testing of a research complex for leaching uranium from mining dumps of uranium mining mines]. Sbornik statej po materialam nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii «Aktual’nye voprosy yaderno-himicheskih tekhnologij i ekologicheskoj bezopasnosti». Sevastopol’: FGAOU VO «SevGU», 2016. pp. 238—241. [In Russ]

9. Gusarov M. A., Yurov A. V., Shchipkov A. A., Leonov S. V. Analiz primenimosti zakonov raspredeleniya dlya ocenki nadezhnosti sistemy operativnogo upravleniya dobychej urana metodom skvazhinnogo podzemnogo vyshchelachivaniya [Analysis of the application of distribution laws to assess the reliability of the operational management system for uranium production by the method of borehole underground leaching]. Sbornik statej po materialam nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii «Aktual’nye problemy innovacionnogo razvitiya yadernyh tekhnologij». Moscow: NIYaU MIFI, 2018. p. 94. [In Russ]

10. Golik V. I., Zaalishvili V. B., Razorenov Yu. I. Experience of uranium mining by leaching. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2014. Vyp. no. 7. pp. 97—103. [In Russ]

11. Goncharova N. A., Gucul M. V., Noskov M. D. Pre-project geotechnological modeling of mining a block of a uranium Deposit using the method of deep underground leaching. Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Fizika. Tomsk: NI TPU, 2017. Tom 60 no. 9—2. pp. 29—32. [In Russ]

12. Lizunkin M. V. Technological schemes of ore preparation for block underground leaching when working out deposits of the Streltsovsky ore field. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2016. no. 3. pp. 297—305. [In Russ]

13. Solodov I. N., Gladyshev A. V., Ivanov A. G. Experience of uranium extraction by the method of well underground leaching in the cryolithozone. exploration and protection of mineral resources. Razvedka i ohrana nedr. 2017. Vyp. no. 11. pp. 65—70. [In Russ]

14. Solodov I. N., Morozov A. A., Physical and chemical geotechnologies the main vector of development of the uranium mining industry. Gornyj zhurnal. 2017. Vyp. no. 8. pp. 5—10. [In Russ]

15. G. Zou, S. Papirio, X. Lai et al., “Column leaching of low-grade sulfide ore from Zijinshan copper mine,” International Journal of Mineral Processing, vol. 139, article 2730, pp. 11–16, 2015.

16. V. Fonti, A. Dell’Anno, and F. Beolchini, “Does bioleaching represent a biotechnological strategy for remediation of contaminated sediments?” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 563—564, pp. 302–319, 2016.

17. Y. Yang, W. Liu, S. K. Bhargava, W. Zeng, and M. Chen, “A XANES and XRD study of chalcopyrite bioleaching with pyrite,” Minerals Engineering, vol. 89, pp. 157–162, 2016.

Our partners

Подписка на рассылку

Раз в месяц Вы будете получать информацию о новом номере журнала, новых книгах издательства, а также о конференциях, форумах и других профессиональных мероприятиях.