On the role of tectonophysical studies in the assessment of industrial and geoecological safety of coal field development

The paper presents the results of evaluating the paleoand modern stress fields in the area of the mine field of the Leninsk-Kuznetsk district of the Kuzbass by methods of tectonophysics. It is shown that the stress field, fixed by the location of the displacement vectors on small local faults, corresponds to a stress field of a higher rank, fixed by secondary displacements on larger faults. In turn, these stress fields correspond to the modern stress field, fixed by the nature of the displacement of the relief elements by the regional Vinogradovsky fault. It is concluded that, different tectonophysical methods of the faults analyzing in the situation of the mine fields in the Leninsk-Kuznetsk region of Kuzbass give close comparable results, which makes it possible to use the simplest of them. Based on the results of a tectonophysical analysis of the faults of mine fields, it is possible to develop methods for the prognostic assessment of the geomechanical state of rock massif and the selection of places for the priority of measures for preliminary it degassing. Preliminary degassing creates conditions for safe intensive mining of coal seams and facilitates the utilization of coal mine methane. Utilization of coalbed methane helps to reduce the impact of the mining on the environment, improves the geo-ecological situation in the region.

Batugin A.S. On the role of tectonophysical studies in the assessment of industrial and geoecological safety of coal field development. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2021;(2—1):241-250. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2021-21-0-241-250.

Batugin A.S., Dr. Sci. (Eng.), proffessor Temp. PEGP NUST «MISiS», Moscow, Russia, as-bat@mail.ru.

1. Artem’ev V.B. JSC «SUEK». Underground mining, dynamics of development. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2018, no. S48, pp. 13—22. [In Russ].

2. Kazanin O.I., Yutyaev E.P. Underground coal mining technologies: current challenges and prospects. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2018, no. S48, pp. 41—51. [In Russ].

3. Slastunov S.V., Kolikov K.S., Yermak G.P., Yutyaev Ye. P. Solutions for coal production safety in the long-term prospective of industry development. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2015, no. 4, pp. 46—48. [In Russ].

4. Yutyaev Evgeny P., Mazanik Evgeny V., Slastunov Sergey V., Batugin Andrian S. (2019) Methodology for the Selection of In-Seam Gas Drainage System for Intensive and Safe Coal Mining. IVth International Innovative Mining Symposium, E3S Web of Conferences 105, 01032 https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201910501032

5. Skopintseva O.V., Balovtsev S.V. Evaluation of the influence of aerodynamic aging of production on aerological risks on coal mines. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2020;(6— 1):74—83. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2020-61-0-74-83.

6. Rybak J., Ivannikov A., Kulikova E., Żyrek T. Deep excavation in urban areas — defects of surrounding buildings at various stages of construction. // MATEC Web Conf. Vol.146, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20181460201.

7. Kuzin A.A., Grishchenkova E.N., & Mustafin M.G. (2017). Prediction of natural and technogenic negative processes based on the analysis of relief and geological structure. Paper presented at the Procedia Engineering , 189 744—751. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.117.

8. Kolikov K.S., Kaledina N.O., Kobylkin S.S. Mining safety and ecology department: Past, present and future. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2018, no. 3, pp. 21—28. doi:10.17580/ gzh.2018.03.04. [In Russ].

9. Zubkov A.V. Stress State of the Earth’s Crust in the Urals. Lithosphere. 2012, no. 3, pp. 3—18.

10. Manchao He, Hongman Xia, Xuena Jia, Weili Gong, Fei Zhao, Kangyuan Liang. Studies on classification, criteria and control of rockbursts. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 2012. Vol. 4. Iss. 2. Pp. 97—114.

11. Metodicheskiye rekomendatsii po otsenke sklonnosti rudnykh i nerudnykh mestorozhdeniy k gornym udaram. Utv. prikazom Federal’noy sluzhby po ekologicheskomu, tekhnologicheskomu i atomnomu nadzoru ot 23 maya 2013 goda № 216 [Guidelines for assessing the propensity of ore and non-ore deposits to rock burst. Approved by order of the Federal Service for Ecological, Technological and Nuclear Supervision of May 23, 2013 no. 216]. Moscow, 2016, 52 p. [In Russ].

12. Hast N. The measurement of rock pressure in mines. 1958. norstedt, Stockholm.

13. Batugin and Shamanskaya. Issledovaniye napryazhennogo sostoyaniya massiva gornykh porod metodom razgruzki v usloviyakh Tashtagol’skogo zhelezorudnogo mestorozhdeniya [Investigations of the stressed state of a rock mass by the stress-relieving method under conditions of the tashtagol iron-ore deposit], Soviet Mining Science, vol. 1(2), pp. 100—104. 1965. Doi:10.1007/BF02501935. [In Russ].

14. Han, J., Zhang, H., Liang, B. et al. Influence of Large Syncline on In Situ Stress Field: A Case Study of the Kaiping Coalfield, China. Rock Mech Rock Eng (2016) 49: 4423, doi.org/10.1007/s00603—016—1039—4

15. Zoback M.L., Zoback M.D., Adams J., Assumpção M., Bell S. et al. Global patterns of tectonic stress. Nature. 1989. Vol. 341. Iss. 6240. Pp. 291—298.

16. Krinitsyn R., Avdeev A., Khudyakov S. Evaluation of geomechanical conditions at magnezitovaya mine when undermining natural and anthropogenic objects. In: E3S Web of Conferences 2018. С. 02017.

17. Belitsky A.A. Klassifikatsiya tektonicheskikh razryvov i geometricheskiye metody ikh izucheniya [Classification of tectonic faults and geometric methods for their study]. Moscow, 1953. 68 p. [In Russ].

18. Gzovsky M.V. Osnovy tektonofiziki [Fundamentals of tectonophysics]. Moscow, 1975, 536 p. [In Russ].

19. Zabrodin A.S. Elementy geometricheskogo i geomekhanicheskogo analiza diz”yunktivov. Marksheyderskoye delo v sotsialisticheskikh stranakh [Elements of geometric and geomechanical analysis of faults. Mine surveying in socialist countries]. Volume 6. Katowice, 1974, pp. 317—324. [In Russ].

20. Batugina I.M. & Petukhov I.M. 1990. Geodynamic zoning of mineral deposits for planning and exploitation of mines. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.

21. Gushchenko O.I. Metod kinematicheskogo analiza struktur razrusheniya pri rekonstruktsii poley tektonicheskikh napryazheniy. Polya napryazheniy i deformatsiy v litosfere [The method of kinematic analysis of fracture structures during reconstruction of tectonic stress fields. Fields of stresses and strains in the lithosphere]. Moscow, 1979, pp. 7—25. [In Russ].

22. Angelier J. Analyses qualitative et quantitative des popullations dejeux de faults. Bull.Soc.Geol. Fr. 1983. 25. Vol. 5, pp. 661—672.

23. Rebetsky Yu. L., Sim L.A. Marinin A.V. Ot zerkal skol’zheniya k tektonicheskim napryazheniyam. Metodiki i algoritmy [From slickensides to tectonic stresses]. Moscow. 2017. [In Russ].

24. Batugin A.S., Lazarevich T.I. Napryazhenno.-deformirovannoye sostoyaniye i osobennosti blochnogo stroyeniya nekotorykh shakhtnykh poley Kuzbassa. Sb. nauch. trudov «Sovershenstvovaniye sposobov razrabotki udaroopasnykh mestorozhdeniy» [Stress state and features of the block structure of some mine fields of Kuzbass. Sat scientific Proceedings “Improving the methods of development of rock burst prone deposits]. Leningrad: VNIMI, 1986, pp. 34—38. [In Russ].