Bibliography: 1. Vedernikov A., Zuev P., Grigoriev D. Geophysical surveys of rock mass status of iron ore deposit with combined deep opencast mining zone. E3S Web of Conferences 2020, Vol. 177, no. 02006, DOI https:. doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/2020177020076
2. Zhukov A. A., Penetration, A. M., And Pushkareva, I. Yu., Tsarev R. I. Experience in using a complex of geophysical methods to identify karst cavities in potash mine dumps. Scientific and Technical journal. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2015. no. 5. pp. 120—130 [In Russ]
3. What is chrysotile? available at: https:. chrysotile.ru/page/what-is-chrysotile, 2021 [In Russ]
4. Chalikakis, K., Plagnes, V., Guerin, R. et al. Contribution of geophysical methods to karst-system exploration: an overview. Hydrogeology Journal 19, 1169 (2011) doi:10.1007/ s10040—011—0746-x
5. Óscar Pueyo Anchuela, Aránzazu Luzón, Héctor Gil Garbi, Antonio Pérez, Andrés Pocoví Juan, María Asunción Soriano, Combination of electromagnetic, geophysical methods and sedimentological studies for the development of 3D models in alluvial sediments affected by karst (Ebro Basin, NE Spain), Journal of Applied Geophysics, Volume 102, 2014, Pages 81—95, ISSN 0926—9851, https:. doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.01.002
6. F. J. Martínez-Moreno, J. Galindo-Zaldívar, A. Pedrera, T. Teixido, P. Ruano, J. A. Peña, L. González-Castillo, A. Ruiz-Constán, M. López-Chicano, W. Martín-Rosales, Integrated geophysical methods for studying the karst system of Gruta de las Maravillas (Aracena, Southwest Spain), Journal of Applied Geophysics, Volume 107, 2014, Pages 149—162, ISSN 0926—9851, https:. doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.05.021
7. S. C. Li, Z. Q. Zhou, Z. H. Ye, L. P. Li, Q. Q. Zhang, Z. H. Xu, Comprehensive geophysical prediction and treatment measures of karst caves in deep buried tunnel, Journal of Applied Geophysics, Volume 116, 2015, Pages 247—257, ISSN 0926—9851, https:. doi. org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.03.019
8. Grigoriev D. V., Vedernikov A. S. Results of using 3d-electrotomography to search for karst voids in salt dump conditions. Problemy nedropolzovania. 2019. no. 4 (23). Pp. 137—143. DOI: 10.25635/2313—1586.2019.04.137 [In Russ]
9. Loke M. H. Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys. Geotomo Software, Res2dinv 3.5 Software. 2004
10. Ronczka, M., Hellman, K., Günther, T., Wisén, R., Dahlin, T., Electric resistivity and seismic refraction tomography: a challenging joint underwater survey at Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory, Solid Earth, 8, 671—682, 2017, https:. doi.org/10.5194/se-8—671—2017
11. Vedernikov A. S., Grigoriev D. V., Zuev P. I. Experience in conducting geophysical surveys during seismic micro-zoning of territories of particularly important objects. XV Uralskaya molodezhnaya nauchnaya shkola po geofizike [XV Ural Youth Scientific School of Geophysics]. Ekaterinburg, 2016. p. 056—060 [In Russ]
12. Zamyatin A. L. Study of the state of the rock mass to ensure the stability of the side of the quarry. Sbornik dokladov VII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-tekhnicheskoi konferentsii v ramkakh Ural’skoi gornopromyshlennoi dekady. Ekaterinburg, 2018. pp. 325—329 [In Russ]
13. Ryazantsev P. A. Geophysical methods of raw material control in the deposits of facing stone. Scientific and technical journal. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2018. no. 4. S. 149—158 DOI: 10.25018/0236—1493—2018—4-0—149—158 [In Russ]
14. Zhou W., Lei M. Summary editorial for karst hydrogeology: advances in karst collapse studies. Environmental Earth Sciences 77, 803 (2018) doi:10.1007/s12665—018— 7990—5
15. Samgyu Park, Myeong-Jong Yi, Jung-Ho Kim, Seung Wook Shin. Electrical resistivity imaging (ERI) monitoring for groundwater contamination in an uncontrolled landfill, South Korea. Journal of Applied Geophysics, Vol. 135. DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.07.004