Biotesting of the Shuvalovo quarry soil by means of algorithm-based processing of ornamental plant cultivation indicators

The eco-toxicity assessment of quality of disturbed soil sampled in the area of the Shuvalovo quarry used the method of bio-testing. The bio-indicators were two ornamental flower varieties belonging to the genus Tagetes (Marigold). The comparative control was performed using a peat sole and a humic pod. The test plants were subjected to morphometry and biochemistry, including the content of heavy metals. For the assessment of impact induced by anthropogenic soil on adaptation lability of plants, the cognitive relevance indexes (CSIfract1, CSIfract2, CSIimpact) were calculated using the developed computer procedure ChemNN. The plants grown using the test soil samples showed a low germination percentage, were undersized and were behind in biomass from the reference species. All test species showed an increased accumulation of Al, Fe, Mn and Ni in the range of 1.3–5.3 times, and Ba—by 50 times on the average. The CSIimpact index was overshot by 2.44 times. Finally, the soil in the test area is phytotoxic and has a decreased biological productivity. On the other hand, the potential of Marigold in phytoremediation, landscaping and improvement of area at the test quarry is proved. It is recommended to perform lime-treatment of soil before planting-out.

Keywords: phytoremediation, heavy metals, Marigold, computer procedure with machine learning components, cognitive relevance index.
For citation:

Puhalsky J. V., Loskutov S. I., Chukaeva M. A., Vorobiev N. I., Voropaeva E. V. Biotesting of the Shuvalovo quarry soil by means of algorithm-based processing of ornamental plant cultivation indicators. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2025;(9):86-100. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2025_9_0_86.

Acknowledgements:

The study was carried out under state contract with the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Contract No. FSRW-2024-0005.

Issue number: 9
Year: 2025
Page number: 86-100
ISBN: 0236-1493
UDK: 579.64: 631.452: 004.032.26
DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2025_9_0_86
Article receipt date: 16.04.2025
Date of review receipt: 03.06.2025
Date of the editorial board′s decision on the article′s publishing: 10.08.2025
About authors:

J.V. Puhalsky1, Researcher, Research and Development Center for Innovative Plant Growing «Winter Garden», e-mail: puhalskyyan@gmail.com, ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5233-3497,
S.I. Loskutov1, Cand. Sci. (Agr.), Director, Research and Development Center for Innovative Plant Growing «Winter Garden», e-mail: lislosk@mail.ru, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8102-2900,
M.A. Chukaeva, Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Senior Researcher, Scientific Center «Ecosystem», Empress Catherine II Saint-Petersburg Mining University, 199106, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, e-mail: shellx@bk.ru, ORCID ID: 0000-0003-3643-6757,
N.I. Vorobiev, Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Leading Researcher, All-Russia Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology, 196608, Pushkin, Russia, e-mail: nik.ivanvorobyov@gmail.com,
E.V. Voropaeva1, Cand. Sci. (Agr.), Assistant Professor, e-mail: lena.voropaeva.1973@mail.ru, ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7542-7285,
1 Leningrad State University named after A.S. Pushkin, 196605, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.

 

For contacts:

M.A. Chukaeva, e-mail: shellx@bk.ru.

Bibliography:

1. Ponomaryov A. B., Zakharov A. V., Tatyannikov D. A., Shalamova E. A. Geotechnical monitoring in the urban construction environment. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. 2023, vol. 60, pp. 452—458. DOI: 10.1007/s11204-023-09914-y.

2. Dzhevaga N., Borisova D. Analysis of air monitoring system in megacity on the example of St. Petersburg. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 2021, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 175—185. DOI: 10.12911/22998993/134076.

3. Erzova V. A., Rumynin V. G., Sudarikov S. M., Shvarts A. A., Vladimirov K. V. Influence of north-west nuclear complex facilities on groundwater contamination (Leningrad Region). Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering. 2021, vol. 332, no. 9, pp. 30—42. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.18799/24131830/2021/9/3351.

4. Skachkova M. E., Guryeva O. S. Monitoring of the State of Saint Petersburg Green Spaces by Remote Sensing Data. Ecology and Industry of Russia. 2023, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 51—57. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.18412/1816-0395-2023-5-51-57.

5. Pashkevich M. A., Danilov A. S. Ecological security and sustainability. Journal of Mining Institute. 2023, vol. 260, pp. 153—154. [In Russ].

6. Smirnov Y. D., Suchkov D. V., Danilov A. S., Goryunova T. V. Artificial soils for restoration of disturbed land productivity. Eurasian Mining. 2021, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 92—96. DOI: 10.17580/ em.2021.02.19.

7. Pashkevich M. A., Bech J., Matveeva V. A., Alekseenko A. V. Biogeochemical assessment of soils and plants in industrial, residential and recreational areas of Saint Petersburg. Journal of Mining Institute. 2020, vol. 241, pp. 125—130. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.31897/PMI.2020.1.

8. Kabirov R. R., Sagitova A. R., Suhanova N. V. Development and use of a multi-component test system for assessing the toxicity of urban soil cover. Ekology. 1997, no. 6, pp. 408—411. [In Russ].

9. Troyanovskaya E. S., Abrosimova O. V., Tihomirova E. I. Assessment of the state of soils in urban areas using the method of complex biotesting. Theoretical and Applied Ecology. 2011, no. 2, pp. 32—36. [In Russ].

10. Alekseenko V. A., Shvydkaya N. V., Alekseenko A. V. Element accumulation patterns of native plant species under the natural geochemical stress. Plants. 2021, vol. 10, no. 1, article 33. DOI: 10.3390/plants10010033.

11. Eremina D. V. Bioinformatics: current state and prospects. Epoch of Science. 2024, no. 37, pp. 12—16. [In Russ].

12. Petuhov A. S., Kremleva T. A., Hritohin N. A., Petuhova G. A. Comparison of the ability of woody plants of different species to accumulate heavy metals in the urban environment. Ecology and Industry of Russia. 2024, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 66—71. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.18412/1816-0395-2024-1166-71.

13. Fedorets N. G., Bahmet O. N. Prospects for growing willow as a phytoremediant in technogenic areas of northwestern Russia. Ecology and Industry of Russia. 2014, no. 12, pp. 48—51. [In Russ].

14. Shulaev N. S., Pryanichnikova V. V., Kadyrov R. R. Regularities of electrochemical cleaning of oil-contaminated soils. Journal of Mining Institute. 2024, vol. 265, pp. 147—155. [In Russ].

15. Liu J., Xin X., Zhou Q. Phytoremediation of contaminated soils using ornamental plants. Environmental Reviews. 2018, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 43—54. DOI: 10.1139/er-2017-0022.

16. Khan A. H. A., Kiyani A., Mirza C. R., Butt T. A., Barros R., Ali B., Iqbal M., Yousaf S. Ornamental plants for the phytoremediation of heavy metals: Present knowledge and future perspectives. Environmental Research. 2021, vol. 195, pp. 117—130. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110780.

17. Rocha C. S., Rocha D. C., Kochi L. Y. Phytoremediation by ornamental plants: a beautiful and ecological alternative. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022, vol. 29, pp. 3336—3354. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17307-7.

18. Ahmad S., Khan J. A., Jamal A. Response of pot marigold to different applied levels of humic acid. Journal of Horticulture and Plant Research. 2019, vol. 5, pp. 57—60.

19. Minisha T. M., Shah I. K., Varghese G. K., Kaushal R. K. Application of Aztec Marigold (Tagetes Erecta L.) for phytoremediation of heavy metal polluted lateritic soil. Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology. 2020, vol. 3, pp. 1—21. DOI: 10.1016/j.enceco.2020.10.007.

20. Singh S. K., Biswojit B. Bioavailability of heavy metals (Cd, Cr, Ni, Pb) to French Marigold (Tagetes Patula L.) in relation to soil properties. Trends in Technical & Scientific Research. 2018, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 555—572. DOI: 10.19080/TTSR.2018.01.555572.

21. Milusheva D. I., Iakimova E. T., Atanassova B. Y. Growth performance of marigold (Tagetes Patula L.) at conditions of soil contamination with Cd, Al and Zn. Journal of Mountain Agriculture on the Balkans. 2016, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 227—245.

22. Aparin B. F., Sukhacheva E. Y. Principles of soil mapping of a megalopolis with St. Petersburg as an example. Eurasian Soil Science. 2014, no. 7, pp. 790—802. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.7868/ S0032180X1407003X.

23. Sverchkov I., Gvozdetskaya M. Quantitative determination of sulfate sulfur in soils and sediments using the S-K and S-K X-ray spectra and PLS regression. Spectrochimica Acta, Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy. 2024, vol. 218. DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2024.106992.

24. Sutrop U. List task and a cognitive salience index. Field Methods. 2001, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 263—276. DOI: 10.1177/1525822X0101300303.

25. Loskutov S. I., Vorobyov N. I., Puhalsky Ya. V. Computer program No. 2024669033, 13.08.2024. [In Russ].

26. Ivanishchev V. V. On the possibility of an applying the method of cluster analysis to results of physiological-biochemical investigations of plants. News of the Tula state university. Natural sciences. 2018, no. 1, pp. 69—77. [In Russ].

27. Tyurin V. V., Shcheglov S. N. Diskriminantniy analiz v biologii: monografiya [Discriminant analysis in biology: monograph], Krasnodar, 2015, 126 p.

28. He Z., Shang X., Wang X., Xing Y., Zhang T., Yun J. The contribution of Ca and Mg to the accumulation of amino acids in maize: from the response of physiological and biochemical processes. BMC Plant Biology. 2024, vol. 24, no. 1, article 579. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-024-05287-y.

Подписка на рассылку

Подпишитесь на рассылку, чтобы получать важную информацию для авторов и рецензентов.